I work in IT and am a software developer.
I'm evaluating Espionage 3 for encryption use.
Something I'm not sure about... it appears that Espionage is internally using Sparsebundles... instead of using something like TrueCrypt / LUKS etc. How does Espionage achieve any real level of plausible deniability using Sparsebundles?
For example if I encrypt one folder, it appears in the Data/ folder as a Sparsebundle. If I encrypt another folder, it appears in the Data/ folder. If someone wanted to know if I had given them all the folder set passwords, all they would have to do is look at all the folders that the password I gave them accessed, and see if there were other Sparsebundle files in Data/ that they did not have access to.
Am I missing something?
I'm evaluating Espionage 3 for encryption use.
Something I'm not sure about... it appears that Espionage is internally using Sparsebundles... instead of using something like TrueCrypt / LUKS etc. How does Espionage achieve any real level of plausible deniability using Sparsebundles?
For example if I encrypt one folder, it appears in the Data/ folder as a Sparsebundle. If I encrypt another folder, it appears in the Data/ folder. If someone wanted to know if I had given them all the folder set passwords, all they would have to do is look at all the folders that the password I gave them accessed, and see if there were other Sparsebundle files in Data/ that they did not have access to.
Am I missing something?