Menu

Show posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.

Show posts Menu

Topics - netjpk

#1
Hi,

I use Espionage mainly to lock folders (I.e., they are not encrypted). Since switching to Mountain Lion, I noticed that I can now click on "locked" folders and still see all their contents. Previously, when clicking on a locked folder, one was prompted to input the password to open the folder - otherwise access was denied. Now, as mentioned, I can immediately see the contents (file names, file types) of the "locked" folders. However, when I double-click a file contained in such a folder it won't open (either "file type not recognized" or "insufficient privileges"). While this is not as good a protection as not even seeing the folders contents, this still prevents unauthorized people from opening these files. However, if I myself want to open these files I have to invoke the Espionage program and switch the folder status manually from "locked" to "unlocked" - needless to say, this is very inconvenient! (I am also not aware of a context-sensitive submenu (right-click) that would offer to unlock a folder!?)

So, I was wondering if that is because of a problem with EspionageHelper or whether there could be another cause for this problem!? In any case, a way to fix it would be appreciated :)

Thanks!

-J.P.
#2
Espionage 2 / Espionage and Hazel
February 19, 2012, 08:10:23 AM
Hi there,

I am currently evaluating Espionage, which seems to offer most of the features I am looking for. However, I was wondering if anybody in here had experiences on how to make it work with Hazel (which is a program scanning folders and performing certain actions when necessary)?!? I was trying to add the Hazel prefpane to the whitelist, but that doesn't stop me from getting the password prompt whenever Hazel is (routinely) checking all folders. I guess the problem is that Hazel is not a program as such, but uses processes (e.g., "hazelfolderwatch"), which perhaps cannot be added to the whitelist!?

I am sure several in this forum must use both applications!? Any leads/hints are appreciated!

Thanks!

-J.P.